Latest news on the Al-Jazeera memo: according to Blair Watch, there are two memos, i.e. the one in the Times from last year & the one in the Mirror from last week are different & that the two people on trial are charged over only one of ‘em.
As Blair Watch say:
If what was reported by the BBC on 17th November, prior to the Mirror story is correct; that Keogh and O'Connor are being prosecuted over the leak of the document 'Iraq in The Medium Term' as published in the Times [May 2004], and not for leaking the source of the Mirror article then the Bliar and his official spokesman would be leaving themselves wide open by describing the Mirror story as 'sub-judice'.
If the Mirror is correct in it's assertion that Keogh and O'Connor are being charged over the source of their story [the transcript], then the story reported by the BBC about them being charged over the leaking of the 'Iraq in the Medium Term' memo was a construct, a 'beard' to cover up the existence of the document referred by the Mirror.
This means our government must have pre planned and disseminated the lie [or spin if you prefer]; that Keogh and O’Connor were being prosecuted over the leaking of the 'Iraq in the medium term' memo.
To cover up the existance of the 'Lets bomb Al-Jazeera' transcript?A plan derailed by the Mirror obtaining a copy and publishing it's story.
The BBC ran the story about Keogh and O'Connor's prosecution on the 17th of November.The Mirror state they approached the Government with their story about Bush wanting to Bomb al-Jazeera 24 hours before publication, on the 22nd of November.
This was four days after we 'learned' via the BBC that Keogh and O'Connor were to be charged with the leak of the 'Iraq in the Medium Term' memo.
If this is the case, the Mirror story did not precipitate the lie [spin] that was reported either wittingly or unwittingly by the BBC on the 17th November, it exposed it.
If we accept Peter Killfoyle's word (and I do) that the Times article and the Mirror article are from different sources, then Keogh and O'Connor cannot be facing charges over both leaks.Either way we are being told lies by our government, and either wittingly or unwittingly by the mainstream media.
29 November, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment